The offers at a glance
| Site | Number type recorded | SMS received |
|---|---|---|
| VirtualSMSNumbers | Physical SIMs according to the lab’s record | 20/20 · 100% |
| BuySMSNumbers | Physical SIMs, no VoIP according to the record | 20/20 · 100% |
| SMSario | Virtual routes and mobile SIMs | 20/20 · 100% |
| TemporarySMSNumber | VoIP and physical SIMs | 20/20 · 100% |
| SMSPVA | Physical SIMs and virtual numbers | Some SMS missing; exact count unrecorded |
Overall ratings assigned by the lab. Reception is equal: each scored provider delivered 20 of 20 expected messages.
What the number labels actually describe
The lab recorded physical-SIM offers at VirtualSMSNumbers and BuySMSNumbers, a mix of VoIP and physical SIMs at TemporarySMSNumber, and a mix of virtual routes and mobile SIMs at SMSario. This gives a useful first filter when a destination service asks for a mobile number.
A mixed catalogue gives information about the provider’s offer; it does not identify the route used for a particular message. The test has no activation-by-activation breakdown of number types. That distinction matters when comparing results: a successful trial at a mixed provider cannot be relabelled as a successful VoIP-only trial.
Compare the results before assigning an advantage to SIMs
In the scored comparison, each of the 4 sites delivered 20 messages across 20 services over 1 month. That includes the physical-SIM offers and the mixed catalogues. On measured reception, the scored providers are tied at 100%.
SMSPVA adds a different experience. Over 1 month and 20 services, the lab found it decent overall but encountered missing SMS messages. Its official offer includes physical-SIM and virtual numbers. The exact received count is unrecorded, so the table keeps this qualitative result alongside the scored providers.
Use number type together with cost and API access
For someone looking specifically at a physical-SIM offer, VirtualSMSNumbers combines a recorded price of €0.10–€0.15, a €30.00 crypto top-up and the lab’s favourite interface. Its REST API, OpenAPI documentation and webhooks also make its integration features explicit. BuySMSNumbers adds the option of card payments, with €0.40–€1.20 recorded prices and a standard API.
Among mixed offers, TemporarySMSNumber combines a clear catalogue with an API the lab found practical. Its prices are €0.50–€0.99, with a 25 $ minimum. SMSario suits direct website use with a modern, organised interface; no API was offered in the record. Its $1.20–$2.90 prices concern US numbers, and its minimum top-up is $25.00.
Keep the reception result separate from code acceptance
The useful comparison is the provider, the required destination service, the offered number type and the cost for that combination. Catalogue labels alone cannot settle which offer will suit a particular request. Our provider-level results give a starting point without pretending that every country, service or route was tested.
Reception and acceptance are separate outcomes. The dataset counts received messages but has no separate count of codes accepted by destination services. The overall scores also measure editorial preference, rather than a technical advantage of SIM over VoIP. For SMSPVA, the unattractive but usable interface and the missing messages are the practical drawbacks to weigh when considering its physical-SIM offer.
Frequently asked questions
Did the test prove that physical SIMs receive OTP messages more reliably?
No. Physical-SIM offers and mixed providers had the same reception result in the scored group. The additional SMSPVA test recorded missing messages, and the data do not isolate the route used for every activation.
Are all numbers at SMSPVA physical-SIM numbers?
Its official page advertises both physical-SIM and virtual numbers. The lab highlighted the physical-SIM offer, but describing the whole catalogue as exclusively physical would be inaccurate.
Which mixed provider is relevant when API access matters?
TemporarySMSNumber offers an API the lab found practical and lists both VoIP and SIM numbers. SMSario also has a mixed catalogue, but no API was offered in the recorded offer. The number type and API are separate selection criteria.
Test record and official sources
Results and ratings come from our lab record. The linked provider documentation adds catalogue, payment and API details.
Suggested citation: triedandtested.org, SMS reception services test, published on September 8, 2026.
- VirtualSMSNumbers catalogueReviewed on September 8, 2026
- API documentationReviewed on September 8, 2026
- Top-ups and how it worksReviewed on September 8, 2026
- SMSPVA — number types and APIReviewed on September 8, 2026