COMPARISON

HushVPS vs HostSailor

Test outcome and published offers, side by side.

From March 1, 2026 to September 1, 2026Updated September 7, 2026

Test result

HushVPS was still active after 6 months. HostSailor was cut off at notice no. 6.

Catalogues consulted on September 7, 2026. Prices vary by region and commitment; they are not the amounts paid during the test.

Results and offers

CriterionHushVPShushvps.com HostSailorhostsailor.com
Results recorded during the test
Test outcomeService running at the end of the 6 monthsNotice no. 6
Country of the rented serverNot recordedRomania
Material publishedNot recordedCopyrighted adult material, published without authorisation.
What triggered the cut-offActive at the end of the testCopyright notice.
What followedActive at the end of the testNot recorded
What the host publishes
Published legal entityNo legal entity publishedHOST SAILOR LIMITED
Company countryNot recordedUnited Arab Emirates
Stated position on noticesExplicitly rejects the “DMCA ignored” label« not bulletproof, not DMCA-ignored, and not an anything-goes host »States it acts on notices« HostSailor reserves the right to terminate your service »
Copyright policyNo copyright policy publishedRead the copyright policy
2 GB tierPhantom, USD 14.00 per month — entry-level planSailor KVM NVMe, USD 8.99 per monthKVM NVMe range in the Netherlands; the tested server was in Romania.
Locations14 published locations4 locations in 3 countries
Transparency on noticesNo notice volume publishedNo notice volume published

Key facts

HushVPS rejects the “DMCA ignored” label and publishes neither a legal entity nor a copyright policy. HostSailor, with its company in the United Arab Emirates and the tested server in Bucharest, cut the service at notice no. 6.

Comparable memory tiers in different parts of each range

HushVPS lists Phantom at USD 14.00 per month, and HostSailor lists Sailor KVM NVMe at USD 8.99 per month. The latter rate covers the Dutch NVMe offer, while the tested HostSailor server was Romanian. These tiers correspond to 2 GB of memory in the catalogues used. The HushVPS tier is its entry plan; the HostSailor tier sits above a smaller offer. The same memory therefore does not put the products in the same position within their ranges. The rate frames the budget; resources, region and plan terms complete the choice.

Rejecting a label and specifying termination

HushVPS explicitly rejects the label “DMCA ignored” on its product page. That text presents a position; it does not by itself describe a detailed copyright procedure. At HostSailor, the acceptable use policy includes a section on copyrighted works: publishing them without permission can lead to termination, and rights holders are invited to provide information about their work. The useful comparison concerns what is actually written before purchase: the words used to sell the offer, the uses covered by the contract and the action it provides for.

An interruption after several notices changes how the test is read

The record places the HostSailor interruption at copyright notice no. 6. This differs from a cutoff on initial receipt: the service reached a later point in the sequence of complaints. It does not, however, give the time between messages or details of their handling. The HostSailor published procedure provides for possible termination; the record identifies the notice at which the interruption was observed for the rented service.

Account requirements and the published identity

HushVPS advertises signup without an identity document and with an optional email address. For a customer who values these account requirements, they provide concrete points to consider alongside the test result. For HostSailor, the record places the server in Romania, while the provider’s public information names a company in the United Arab Emirates. The server location and published entity describe different things. Before buying, compare the information requested at signup, the acceptable uses and the entity named in the chosen plan’s contract. These details give a clearer basis for choosing than location alone.

Questions to help you choose

Why consider HushVPS if it rejects “DMCA ignored”?

The choice draws on the continuity record, where HushVPS appears among the services active at the close. Its rejection of the label is additional public information. Account criteria and the test result offer more than a word included in an offer.

Are all the compared offers entry-level plans?

Phantom is the entry tier at HushVPS. Sailor KVM NVMe is not the entry tier at HostSailor, which offers a smaller plan. The comparison matches their 2 GB memory allocation, rather than an identical position within their respective catalogues.

Is the country of the HostSailor company the same as the tested server’s?

The record places HostSailor’s server in Romania, while its published entity is in the United Arab Emirates. These details serve different purposes: one locates the server, the other describes the company named by the provider. Check the selected plan’s contract to identify its contracting entity.

Provider sources

The test data
Comparison protocol

One VPS per host over the same period. Actual rights-holder notices, at varying rates. Outcome recorded by the testers: service active or cut off. Policies and prices are published provider information; details of individual notice handling are unavailable.

Read the full report