Catalogues consulted on September 7, 2026. Prices vary by region and commitment; they are not the amounts paid during the test.
Results and offers
| Criterion | VPSDENvpsden.com | FlokiNETflokinet.is |
|---|---|---|
| Results recorded during the test | ||
| Test outcome | Service running at the end of the 6 months | Notice no. 2 |
| Country of the rented server | Not recorded | Iceland |
| Material published | Not recorded | Copyrighted video streaming material, published without authorisation. |
| What triggered the cut-off | Active at the end of the test | Copyright notice. |
| What followed | Active at the end of the test |
|
| What the host publishes | ||
| Published legal entity | VPSDen Systems Ltd. | FlokiNET ehf |
| Company country | Panama — stated by the site, with no verifiable registration | Iceland |
| Stated position on notices | Claims not to act on notices | Ambiguous position« not willing to knowingly help someone silence valid criticism » |
| Copyright policy | Read the copyright policy | Read the copyright policy |
| 2 GB tier | CIPHER, EUR 4.40 per month — entry-level planPublished base price for Reykjavik; pricing varies by region. | Romania VPS II, EUR 14.99 per monthRomanian plan, with a EUR 5.00 setup fee. The tested server was in Iceland. |
| Locations | 9 published locations | 4 published locations |
| Transparency on notices | No notice volume published | No notice volume published |
Key facts
VPSDEN states that it forwards notices to customers and acts only on a local court decision, with exceptions by location. FlokiNET cut the service at notice no. 2, then refused restoration despite an offer to remove the content.
Read the rates alongside the server region
CIPHER is listed at EUR 4.40 per month at the Icelandic reference rate for VPSDEN. The price then varies with the chosen region. At FlokiNET, Romania VPS II is listed at EUR 14.99 per month for the Romanian offer, with setup fees in the ordering catalogue. The FlokiNET VPS observed in the test was Icelandic. The price comparison therefore presents public 2 GB offers, rather than invoices for the tested servers. For a planned order, recording the exact region alongside the tier name and upfront fees gives you a usable cost comparison.
Forwarding or documented assessment of the complaint
VPSDEN describes acknowledging a complaint and forwarding it to the customer for information. Its policy then distinguishes locations, with provisions specific to European and Malaysian regions. FlokiNET requests a documented claim and states that it checks the legal requirements under the server country’s law before acting. The document also rejects notices deemed false or overly broad. For the customer, the useful comparison concerns the stated processes: receiving a complaint, any assessment, the information forwarded and the stated trigger for taking action on the service.
Offering to remove the content did not restore the VPS
The FlokiNET case does not end at notice no. 2. The testers offered to remove the reported content to obtain reinstatement; restoration was refused. This distinguishes a temporary measure followed by resolution from an interruption the customer could not remedy through that proposal. For an established project, it describes what followed the dispute: the proposed content removal did not allow a return to the same service. That consequence is what completes the notice number shown in the table.
Choose a procedure alongside the location
For a purchase driven by continuity under notices, VPSDEN is the starting point in this comparison because of its recorded outcome. Choosing its location then requires reading the rule for that region. The Icelandic FlokiNET server and refused restoration show why the country alone is an incomplete criterion. Comparing these offers means combining a location, a rate and a contractual complaint-handling procedure. If your scenario depends on getting back online after removing content, the documented FlokiNET case is particularly relevant.
Questions to help you choose
Does the FlokiNET price in the table correspond to the server tested?
The Romania VPS II price corresponds to a public Romanian offer, while the FlokiNET server recorded in the test was Icelandic. The table compares the catalogue’s memory tier; it does not present the invoice for that rental.
What happened after the offer to remove the content?
At FlokiNET, the offer to remove the reported content was followed by refused reinstatement. The record therefore documents an attempted resolution that did not restore access to the VPS, beyond the notice that triggered the interruption.
Is the VPSDEN policy identical in every region?
The document distinguishes locations and provides specific provisions for European and Malaysian regions. Read the intended region’s procedure alongside its rate. The general statement about forwarding notices to the customer does not, by itself, describe all those provisions.
Provider sources
The test dataComparison protocol
One VPS per host over the same period. Actual rights-holder notices, at varying rates. Outcome recorded by the testers: service active or cut off. Policies and prices are published provider information; details of individual notice handling are unavailable.