Catalogues consulted on September 7, 2026. Prices vary by region and commitment; they are not the amounts paid during the test.
Results and offers
| Criterion | VPSDENvpsden.com | BitHostingbit.hosting |
|---|---|---|
| Results recorded during the test | ||
| Test outcome | Service running at the end of the 6 months | Before any notice |
| Country of the rented server | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Material published | Not recorded | Copyrighted adult or video streaming material, published without authorisation. The exact type was not recorded for this server. |
| What triggered the cut-off | Active at the end of the test | Cut off before any notice. |
| What followed | Active at the end of the test | Not recorded |
| What the host publishes | ||
| Published legal entity | VPSDen Systems Ltd. | ОсОО «Альянс Торг Компани» |
| Company country | Panama — stated by the site, with no verifiable registration | Kyrgyzstan |
| Stated position on notices | Claims not to act on notices | States it acts on notices« Copyright violations (including DMCA) » |
| Copyright policy | Read the copyright policy | Read the copyright policy |
| 2 GB tier | CIPHER, EUR 4.40 per month — entry-level planPublished base price for Reykjavik; pricing varies by region. | BitGo, 6.00 $ per monthThe catalogue displays the $ symbol without a confirmed currency code. |
| Locations | 9 published locations | 9 published locations |
| Transparency on notices | No notice volume published | No notice volume published |
Key facts
BitHosting cut the service before any notice. Its full legal details, published on the Russian version of its website, identify a company in Kyrgyzstan. VPSDEN states that it forwards notices to customers and acts only on a local court decision, with exceptions by location.
Compare plans with their currency and location
VPSDEN’s catalogue lists CIPHER at EUR 4.40 per month at the Reykjavik reference rate. BitHosting lists BitGo at 6.00 $ per month. Both amounts concern the 2 GB tier, with an explicit currency at VPSDEN and a dollar symbol at BitHosting. The payment currency therefore needs checking when ordering. VPSDEN’s catalogue also varies prices by location. For budget planning, keeping the plan, region, billed period and currency together provides comparable reference points. The catalogues consulted on September 7, 2026 document these public offers.
Compare what can trigger action
VPSDEN’s policy describes forwarding notices to the customer and taking no action absent a local court order, with regional exceptions. BitHosting’s organises abuse handling: required evidence, assessment of the report, a response, and suspension when abuse is confirmed. The provider rejects anonymous reports and does not publish a counter-notice procedure. This difference helps interpret the contracts beyond the word copyright: identify the grounds for action, the evidence required from the complainant, and the place given to the customer’s response in the specific offer under consideration.
An interruption before a complaint arrived
BitHosting’s case does not describe a sequence of copyright complaints. The service was interrupted before a report arrived; the testers attribute the exit to a content review by the provider. The recorded fact is the absence of a complaint before the cut-off. This case therefore adds a different trigger to the continuity comparison: an outside notice was not necessary for the interruption. VPSDEN’s active outcome can be compared with it over the test period, without turning that exit into a measured tolerance threshold for notices.
Choose using the grounds for interruption as well as complaints
If the requirement is to compare services that remained available through the close, VPSDEN has the favourable result in this comparison. The specific value of BitHosting’s case is to broaden the reading before purchase: permitted-content terms matter even without a third-party complaint. Examine that part of the contract, then the notification procedure for the chosen region, to make the choice concrete. Price can then distinguish the shortlisted offers.
Questions to help you choose
Why does BitHosting appear under other reasons for interruption?
Its service was interrupted before any prior complaint. The record attributes the exit to a content review, so it documents no copyright-notice number triggering the cut-off. The case provides information about project continuity and the grounds for an interruption.
Is VPSDEN’s policy identical across all regions?
The document describes forwarding to the customer and rules that differ by location, with exceptions to the general policy. An order therefore needs a specified region to identify the stated handling of notices and the corresponding price.
Can EUR 4.40 and 6.00 $ be compared directly?
VPSDEN’s price specifies its currency; BitHosting’s uses a dollar symbol without a currency code in the retained source. To establish the budget, check the payment currency, region and billed period in the order.
Provider sources
The test dataComparison protocol
One VPS per host over the same period. Actual rights-holder notices, at varying rates. Outcome recorded by the testers: service active or cut off. Policies and prices are published provider information; details of individual notice handling are unavailable.